Since the Rutherford Institute Attorney reported that "women's groups were going to announce support of Paula Corbin Jones's appeal," we have received a lot of mail in vehement opposition.
We agree. Filing a "friend of the court" -- amicus -- brief, would be disastrous, especially since it would be in response to the goading and unfair criticism of women by the right wing political groups.
It would be a great mistake because it would be used against us over and over again. It would be misinterpreted by the press and appear in political advertisements. No matter how carefully crafted, the political supporters of P.C.J. would claim that, "In filing this brief, women's groups support her claims and believe she is telling the truth."
In addition, we would all receive a figurative pinch on the butt from the ry-chus ones, along with insidious remarks such as, "Way to go, bitch!"
The
political advertisements would feature women's movement leaders telling
the media of womens's unqualified support. We have already
seen this happen when a knee-jerk reaction to the TV appearance of Kathryn
Willey caused a women's movement leader to make several ill advised statements.
These were immediately snatched out of context and misrepresented by politicians and the media. In light of the revelations that followed, those "off the cuff" words come back to haunt and embarrass us all, again and again.
We can understand that women may feel unjustly attacked by the label of "hypocrite." that has been so liberally applied by the conservatives. "Why," they taunt, "did you support Anita Hill but won't support P.C.J.? Hypocrites!"
But it is not a time to react with emotion. It is a time to respond with logic and reason. We must make clear that we are supportive of anti-harassment laws and will work to make them stronger and more definitive.
We must also make the following points:
[This has been done in the case of PCJ, who has had the benefit of several attorneys plus the monetary backing of the Rutherford Institute and the followers of conservatives such as Jerry Falwell and Rush Limbaugh.]
[This has been done over and over again for P.C.J. Neither she nor the conservative money mavens need any help from women's groups in this regard.]
Once again, he has ordered Susan Mc Dougal to the Grand Jury in Arkansas. She has already demonstrated that she will not lie, as Starr has demanded, by serving 18 months in jail on civil contempt charges. Now, he is poised to send her to jail for another 18 months or more on criminal contempt charges.
This is an atrocious and despicable use of power against a woman. If Starr has charges against President Clinton then let him bring them forth and stop his unreasonable torture of Susan Mac D.
1998-017
Copyright 1998 Renee T. Louise and Ruth M. Sprague, Ph.D. These articles may be republished for noncommercial use only, provided that they are copied intact, and that this copyright notice is attached. Address all queries to: TWANDA@ConnRiver.net.
G e n d e r G a p p e r s T M
Our
congratulations to the National Organization
for Women on winning their lawsuit filed in 1986. It was
the first nationwide class action lawsuit ever filed against the anti-abortion
movement under RICO.
They have delivered a blow to the bullies of Operation Rescue and their fellow terrorists -- a swift kick to that part of their anatomy that contains their true feelings -- their wallets. "Way to go, WOMEN!" |