THEY STILL DON'T GET
IT
There is a play
written by Jane Martin in 1993 called "Keely and Du". It comes
close to being fair to both sides of the abortion debate.
The major characters are a young woman, Keely, who is seeking an abortion
after being raped by her husband and Du, an older woman.
Du along with another
anti-abortion extremist, a male minister, kidnaps Keely when she was on
the way to terminate her pregnancy. Here we have the classic confrontation
of free will and religion.
Legally, Keely has
the right to have an abortion; but the minister and Du have the power to
stop her by chaining her to a bed in a basement. Here most of the action
is played out with Du watching over a very angry Keely.
The minister, who
of course feels he has all the rights on his side due to his gender - being
made in the image of God and his vocation as God's representative on earth
-- at first calmly exhorts Keely.
She remains intractable
and over the days and nights this angers the man to the point that he raves
like the anti-abortion screamers that flock outside women's clinics. Even
Du finds him ridiculous and tells Keely that, "He is with God but
he is insufferable about it."
As the women spend
more time together, they develop a friendship. They understand that they
have much in common and, as women, can find amusement in the foibles of
the raving minister.
Things do not
end well in this play. How could they? Religion
as always divides people, bringing hatred by the powerful and resentment
by the weak. However males usually find what they think is a solution for
the abortion debate in the play.
Because Keely
and Du seemingly come to like and understand each other, mostly male reviewers
of the play think that putting the two sides in one room together, just
to talk quietly would bring a solution.
One such reviewer
based this on Roe versus Wade suggest opposition (versus), whereas Keely
and Du brings a word (and) of inclusion and togetherness and hope. He
disregarded the 500 pound gorilla in the room -- men's religion which enslaves
womankind.
But one real point
of the play is to show that captivity and force of one gender by another
just has no saving grace. Males cannot be raped and impregnated by a stronger,
privileged gender and forced to continue a pregnancy because of the stronger,
privileged gender's religion.
They still don't
get it when they think religion and freedom can sit down in a room together
and compromise. They never will as long as women's bodies are owned by
the state.
gapperserve-at-peoplepc.com
http://gendergappers.blogspot.com
2007-011
Copyright
2007 Renee T. Louise and Ruth M. Sprague, Ph.D. These articles may be republished
for noncommercial use only, provided that they are copied intact, and that
this copyright notice is attached. Address all queries to: gapperserve@peoplepc.com.
G e
n d e r G a p p e r s T
M
|